![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
Scientists, consumer groups say GE corn for ethanol will contaminate foodThe Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and Center for Food Safety (CFS) recently warned that approval of the first genetically engineered corn for ethanol would inevitably contaminate corn intended for the food and feed supply, exposing people to new engineered proteins that may pose an allergy risk. No consideration of health, environmental impacts In comments submitted to the USDA, the Union of Concerned Scientists called on the agency to ban the outdoor production of ethanol corn and all other food crops engineered for industrial or drug purposes to protect the food supply. Additionally, UCS supports moving beyond corn—engineered or not—as a biofuel source because it may contribute to, rather than reduce, global warming pollution and because alternative sources can be obtained in a more responsible and sustainable manner. “The Bush administration’s USDA rushed this GE corn to the brink of approval without giving any serious consideration to its potential impacts on human health, the environment, or the economy,” said Bill Freese, CFS science policy analyst. “Syngenta’s biofuels corn will inevitably contaminate food-grade corn, and likely trigger substantial rejection in our corn export markets, hurting farmers. We urge the Obama administration to give this first-ever GE industrial crop a careful and thorough assessment before making a final decision.” Certainly contaminate food supply If grown at the scale Syngenta intends, the new corn would certainly contaminate the food supply, according to UCS scientists. As a result, people would wind up consuming these new proteins, which have never been in food and were never intended for human consumption. Absent this history of human exposure, scientists are uncertain if these new proteins will produce allergic reactions. Trade groups and companies involved in milling, refining, and exporting corn, including the Corn Refiners Association, National Grain and Feed Association, North American Export Grain Association, and North American Millers’ Association, also opposed USDA approval of this GE corn, citing concerns that its engineered protein could damage food products such as breakfast cereals and snack foods and disrupt exports of such products. Copyright The Organic & Non-GMO Report March 2009 |
|
||||||||||
Tel. 1-800-854-0586 (U.S.) or 1-641-209-3426 Email: ken@non-gmoreport.com
PO Box 436, Fairfield, IA 52556 USA
© Copyright 2001-2010. The Organic & Non-GMO Report. site map